For organizations under 200 people that want to manage their use of ChatGPT and gain some collaboration features, OpenAI's main offering is ChatGPT Teams. This guide will consider ChatGPTs strengths and weaknesses and how best to implement and get the most value from ChatGPT Teams.
ChatGPT Teams organizes work through shared workspaces and project folders that create dedicated spaces for different initiatives. Team members can collaborate within these common workspaces by sharing their conversations (see below), uploading reference files, and maintaining templates for repeated tasks. This structure keeps related work together and makes it easy for team members to find relevant conversations and resources. Projects can be organized by department, campaign, product development cycle, or any other logical grouping that matches your team's workflow.
In ChatGPT Teams, each user's conversations remain private unless explicitly shared. After the conversation is shared, team members can view it and fork it (picking up on the conversation and making it their own). Note that the conversations are not truly shared in the sense of many people participating in one ongoing conversation.
ChatGPT Teams can connect to external tools like Google Drive, SharePoint, Microsoft Teams, and GitHub, allowing teams to pull content from across their tech stack for shared reference and analysis. These connectors enable ChatGPT to access and work with documents, code repositories, and other resources that teams already use in their workflows. This integration capability means teams don't have to manually copy and paste content between tools, making ChatGPT a more natural extension of existing processes.
Users of ChatGPT teams can create and share custom GPTs across the organization. CustomGPTs are specialized AI assistants trained on your company's specific needs, processes, and knowledge.
Senior employees can encode their knowledge into custom GPTs, making their insights available to junior team members 24/7. This creates a multiplier effect where institutional knowledge doesn't walk out the door when key people leave.
Currently, custom GPTs are available to all team members without granular permission controls, which encourages sharing and collaboration while maintaining simplicity.
ChatGPT Teams users sometimes get priority access to new models and features. This early access can be a benefit for teams that need cutting-edge capabilities for competitive advantage.
ChatGPT Teams gives each member their own message allocation. This prevents the scenario where power users consume all available resources, leaving teammates without access when they need it most.
ChatGPT Teams provides a streamlined three-tier role system that balances simplicity with necessary governance:
Workspace owners and admins get centralized control over team resources and access through a single admin console. They can manage who joins the team, configure which external connectors are available to members, and control access to shared resources like custom GPTs and uploaded files. Admins can enable or disable specific connectors based on security requirements, control privacy settings, rate limits, and data retention policies.
While the permission system is relatively simple, it provides enough governance for most teams while keeping administration straightforward. Any member can invite other users to join, which enables usage to grow rapidly but provides less control than some organizations desire. The admin console provides visibility into usage patterns and helps identify opportunities for optimization or additional training, allowing teams to maintain consistent policies across all members while adapting settings as organizational needs evolve.
ChatGPT Teams lacks true real-time collaboration with your team. You cannot be in the same chat with your teammates interacting with the AI. You can only share a chat after the fact and have the teammate branch off of it. Many organizations copy from a chat into a Google Doc to have team collaboration and then someone copies back from the Google Doc to ChatGPT to continue. This is a major flaw for a Teams solution.
ChatGPT Teams also lacks true collaborative editing features with AI. You can't co-edit documents with AI. You can work with AI in a chat, copy the output to Google Doc, edit it there, and copy it back. This is the second major flaw for a Teams solution.
Custom GPTs are all-or-nothing for team access. You can't restrict certain GPTs to specific departments or roles, which can be problematic for organizations with sensitive or specialized processes.
ChatGPT Teams excels when:
ChatGPT Teams struggles when:
Understanding these trade-offs upfront helps set realistic expectations and guides implementation decisions. The most successful teams acknowledge these limitations and design their workflows accordingly, rather than trying to force ChatGPT Teams into use cases where it's not optimized.
Project folders are key for ChatGPT Teams organization. Create dedicated spaces like:
This keeps related conversations together and makes knowledge retrieval much easier.
Some best practices on sharing files in ChatGPT Teams
.txt
or .md
files over PDFs for better context retentionWhen conversations get unwieldy (around 500k characters), don't just start over. Instead:
ChatGPT Teams is priced at $25 per user per month (when billed annually) or $30 per user per month (when billed monthly).
Productivity Metrics
Engagement Metrics
Business Impact
Create monthly reports covering:
Understanding how your data is handled is crucial for enterprise adoption:
Successful teams follow structured onboarding:
Power Users: Often need advanced features and early access to new models
Casual Users: May only need AI for specific tasks
Skeptical Users: Need to see clear value before adoption
Knowledge Base Integration
Specialized Functions
Prompt Engineering for Custom GPTs
Anthropic Teams: Claude for Work provides similar team features with Claude AI, offering shared workspaces, custom instructions, and team management tools. It's positioned as a more privacy-focused alternative with strong security controls, though it currently has fewer integrations and a smaller ecosystem compared to ChatGPT Teams. It also has the two strongest weaknesses of ChatGPT Teams ... inability to collaborate in a chat conversation with your team and inability to collaboratively edit AI output with the AI and your team. https://www.anthropic.com/learn/claude-for-work
Stravu: Stravu is a next generation AI solution addressing ChatGPT Teams' two greatest weaknesses. Stravu enables you to collaborate with your team in a shared AI conversation and it enables you to work in a collaborative document/notebook editing it with AI and with your team. No more copying to Google Docs and back. https://stravu.com
ChatGPT Teams has some benefits for teams under 50 people who want to share historic AI chats, group chats and attachments in projects, and scale expertise in shared GPTs. It's simple to manage but limited in collaborative features. Consider alternatives, like Stravu, for true team collaboration with AI in conversations and editable documents.